I think it has something to do with having to pay for SSH2 for commercial
uses, but I may be wrong. It seemed like they used SSH1 to lure us in and
then did a bait and switch with licensing.
I've been using openssh since Mandrake 7.0 offered to download and install
it during the initial install. It's pretty slick.
-Rick
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Michael Long wrote:
> What do you mean poory licensed. WHat is the difference (in terms of
> license) between ssh1 and ssh2?
>
> Mike
>
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Sean-Paul Rees wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 11:42:40AM -0800, Mike McCaskey wrote:
> > > has anybody successfully setup an ssh2 server (and clients)?
> >
> > Don't use ssh2!!!! Its poorly licensed, OpenSSH all the way!
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Sean
> >
> > **********************************************************
> > * Sacramento Linux Users Group Mailing List
> > *
> > * Unsubscribe: Send a message to majordomo@saclug.org
> > * With 'unsubscribe lug-nuts' in the body
> > *
> > * http://www.saclug.org
> >
>
> **********************************************************
> * Sacramento Linux Users Group Mailing List
> *
> * Unsubscribe: Send a message to majordomo@saclug.org
> * With 'unsubscribe lug-nuts' in the body
> *
> * http://www.saclug.org
>
**********************************************************
* Sacramento Linux Users Group Mailing List
*
* Unsubscribe: Send a message to majordomo@saclug.org
* With 'unsubscribe lug-nuts' in the body
*
* http://www.saclug.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 25 2000 - 14:29:12 PST