On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 02:04:07PM -0800, Marc Matteo wrote:
> <grin> I won a copy from MS last week. It's still sitting on my desk at
> home.
>
In the demonstration this morning, they were talking about windows
2000 uptime. First thing I am going to look for under win 2k is an
uptime meter. They boasted they had a test system running for 90+ days
straight. I had to laugh on that one. Hmm, my Linux box at home is at:
2:12pm up 117 days, 17:54, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
brian ttyp0 debian Wed11pm 14:57m 0.25s 0.22s mutt
brian ttyp1 blavender.spk.us 2:10pm 0.00s 0.47s 0.30s mutt
brian ttyp2 blavender.spk.us 1:33pm 2:43 2.50s 2.32s mutt
And here is another one. windows 2000 states that it requires a 133,
but I have read on CNET that they would not run it under anything less
than a 250. Dell is not selling it on anything less than a 400.
But I still want to see what is under the hood. No, no, I take that
back. I want to take it for a test drive. Windows still doesn't let you
muck with it under the hood.
Shall we say the source is with us?
Good thing Luke is on our side.
brian
-- Brian Lavender http://www.brie.com/brian/ ********************************************************** * Sacramento Linux Users Group Mailing List * * Unsubscribe: Send a message to majordomo@saclug.org * With 'unsubscribe lug-nuts' in the body * * http://www.saclug.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 25 2000 - 14:29:12 PST