Version 1.0 of Gnome was far less stable than NT. I didn't bother with
KDE, wasn't much of a CDE fan when I had an HP-UX box. I'd rather do
straight WindowMaker if I were to go back to Linux as my desktop OS.
Don't know how Redhat 6.1/Gnome is but my guess not that much better.
I'm also kinda bummed I read all this negative stuff about Netscape on
Linux. It runs fine for me on NT but then so does IE 5.0. Netscape is
fatter and slower than I.E. 5 which is not great but it doesn't crash.
Isn't Opera working on a Linux port?
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 11/3/99 at 5:20 AM Hubert Littau scribbled:
>I found Gnome to be about as stable as Netscape for Linux or for that
matter,
>Microsoft *.*
>For me kde has been the work horse with Mandrake as well as straight
Redhat.
>My own relatively early impression is that if there was one thing that
would
>hold Linux back from desktop use it would have to be Netscape or the
lack of
>a feature-comparable replacement.
>
>Eric Andreasen wrote:
>
>> Caldera Open Linux 2.2 and Mandrake (RedHat) 6.1. I go back and
forth. I
>> really like the look and feel of Gnome and Enlightenment. Celeron
466 on
>> Abit BP6, 64MB RAM (more processors and RAM to come!) Having a
problem with
>> AGP though, doh! Will try to install driver tonight (a first for
me).
>>
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Scott Tyson
Deepwell Gaming Server admin
tysons@deepwell.com ICQ#: 125581
http://rand.deepwell.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 25 2000 - 14:29:07 PST